Rick van der Wal, aka Digado, a blogger I have great respect for, recaps Ren Reynolds lively taxonomy discussion at Terra Nova:
* Game world
* Lucid World
* Metaverse
* MMORPG
* MMO
* MOO
* MUSH
* MUD
* WoW
* RPG
* HUD
* RCE
* RMT
* Synthetic World
* Social World
* Thick Virtual World
* Thin Virtual World
* Virtual World
If you can get past the emergent nomenclature I suggest you read his entire take-away on immersionism and augmentation and the comments.
The Views
He notes and adds, as I believe, they are NOT mutually exclusive…
Immersionist’s point of view
Virtuality is… a new reality, a new world (or as Philip Linden/Rosedale once said - “A country”), a new frontier.
Most common issues: The Avatar as a person, new builds and ‘In-world’ developments, in-world authority, the community and underlying relations, the future (a long-term time frame of 10-25 years from now).
Key elements: Freedom, vision, escapism, trust, recognition, community, immersion.
Augmentionist’s point of view
Virtuality is… a tool - a medium, a game and an extension/evolution/continuation of the internet and communication.
Most common issues: Perception of mainstream media, elevating the platform of Virtual worlds as a tool/medium, how virtual worlds influence the real world - economic, education, entertainment for ‘real people’, the timeframe of now until 3 years from now.
Key elements: Adoption of Technology, opportunity, verification, research, return on investments, benefits of virtuality, cross ‘realm’ communication.
Boiling It Down
1. Immersion and augmentism are not mutually exclusive.
2. Immersionists are a movement based on escapism.
3. Augmentists are opportunists.
Rick I think they are blog worthy issues and thank you…as I have been trying to find a good blend of “not mutually exclusive.” None of these schools of thought are “black and white”. That is why I think VR communities should pay attention to the thought leaders struggling with revenue generation and Web 2.0- and pollution- not to mention concentration risk. See my latest on Revenews.
Popularity: 4% [?]
Share This